Welcome to “The Ultimate Guide to Threat Modeling Tools,” your comprehensive resource for understanding the critical role of automated threat modeling in cybersecurity and navigating through the plethora of tools available, both “free” and enterprise solutions.
This guide analyzes the features, costs, benefits, and potential drawbacks of various threat modeling tools. In the following sections, you’ll find expert insights on the essence of threat modeling, what to consider when choosing the right tool for your needs, and in-depth descriptions of solutions.
We’ll guide you through specifics such as integration capabilities, user scenarios, and the pros and cons of each tool. By the end of this guide, you’ll be well-equipped to make informed decisions that bolster your software’s defense mechanisms tailored to the unique requirements of your project or organization.
Understanding threat modeling is fundamental in today’s environment, where cyber threats are ever-evolving, and security measures must be proactive rather than reactive.
What Is Threat Modeling?
Stay tuned as we delve into what threat modeling entails and how to select the ideal tool that aligns with your security objectives and budgetary considerations. Threat modeling is a proactive approach to identifying, assessing, and mitigating potential security threats in software systems at an early stage of development.
As a fundamental aspect of secure software development, threat modeling serves as a structured process that guides teams through analyzing the design of their systems, identifying potential security risks, and prioritizing actions to address these risks before adversaries can exploit them.
The process generally includes several core activities:
- Identifying security objectives: Clearly defining what needs to be protected within the system to guide the threat modeling process.
- Creating architectural diagrams: Visualizing the system’s components, data flows, and boundaries to understand where threats could emerge.
- Enumerating potential threats: Using classification frameworks to list possible security threats systematically, such as STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, and Elevation of Privilege).
- Assessing risks: Determining the likelihood of each threat and its potential impact on the system to prioritize responses.
- Defining countermeasures: Outlining the methods and controls required to prevent, detect, or mitigate identified threats.
By integrating threat modeling into the software development lifecycle (SDLC), organizations can prevent costly security incidents and foster a culture of security mindfulness that permeates through all stages of development.
Furthermore, threat modeling aligns teams towards a common security goal, providing a clear roadmap for engineers, architects, and security professionals to collaborate effectively on software projects. Next, we’ll explore what factors should influence your choice of a threat modeling tool and why they are crucial for effectively securing your application.
What to Consider When Selecting a Threat Modeling Tool
The choice of a threat modeling tool should consider cost, usability, versatility, integration capabilities, scalability, and support availability to ensure a good fit for your organization’s needs.
When evaluating threat modeling tools, looking beyond the surface-level features and considering how a tool will function within your organization’s environment and processes is essential. Here are key considerations to keep in mind:
Cost
Determine your budget and consider the total cost of ownership, including initial purchase, maintenance, and potential upgrades. Free tools can be a great starting point, but ensure they provide sufficient functionality for your needs. For enterprise solutions, weigh the investment against the value it provides.
Usability
The tool should have an intuitive interface with clear documentation and onboarding resources, making it accessible for all team members, including those with less security expertise.
Versatility and Methodologies
Find a tool that supports various threat modeling methodologies, such as STRIDE or CAPEC, to tailor your approach to different projects or organizational requirements.
Integration Capabilities
Choose a tool that integrates seamlessly with your existing DevSecOps tools and workflows. This integration helps maintain efficiency and automates aspects of the threat modeling process.
Scalability
Ensure the tool can handle your organization’s growth, both in terms of the size and complexity of projects it can support.
Support and Community Engagement
When choosing a free threat modeling tool, consider the level of support offered by the tool’s provider and the presence of a vibrant community for sharing best practices, updates, and troubleshooting advice.
Additional factors may include:
- Customization: The ability to customize the tool to address specific security needs, policies, and compliance standards relevant to your organization, industry or sector.
- Collaboration Features: As threat modeling is often a cross-functional activity, look for features that enable collaboration among team members.
- Reporting and Documentation: Rich reporting capabilities can help communicate the findings and required actions to stakeholders effectively.
- Active Development: A tool actively maintained and developed ensures that you benefit from the latest security practices, approaches, and fixes for any issues.
- Reputation: Research the tool provider’s market standing, user reviews, and responsiveness to security issues.
By considering these considerations, you can make an informed decision that enhances your threat modeling efforts and contributes meaningfully to your software’s overall security posture. In the subsequent sections, we will explore various threat modeling tools and analyze how they stack up against these considerations.
Detailed Analysis of Free Threat Modeling Tools
In this section, we’ll provide a deeper insight into each of the free threat modeling tools previously mentioned, highlighting their capabilities, ideal use cases, and potential limitations.
1. OWASP Threat Dragon
OWASP Threat Dragon is an excellent choice for a holistic, integrative approach to threat modeling, offering versatility without compromising cost.
| Cost | Completely free and open-source, enabling organizations to employ threat modeling without financial barriers. |
| Usability | Intuitive interface suitable for novices; however, it might require some security knowledge to utilize fully. |
| Versatility and Methodologies | Supports STRIDE and LINDDUN, among others, catering to various threat modeling approaches. |
| Integration | Web and desktop options provide flexibility, though it may not integrate with all third-party tools. |
| Scalability | Ideal for small to medium-sized projects but may lack the depth for larger enterprises. |
| Support and Community Engagement: | Strong community and regular updates reflect its open-source nature. |
| Pros | No installation required for web version; Collaborative features for team-based modeling. |
| Cons | May not cover all security scenarios for complex systems; Updates and features are community-dependent. |
| Website & GitHub | Accessible at OWASP Threat Dragon with development contributions on GitHub. |
| Reviews | Earned 56 stars on Github.
The tool was praised for its ease of creating threat models, provision for pre-built templates, design view, available documentation, analysis view, and regular updates.
However, it was noted that the tool lacks guidance on threat mitigation or remediation and the ability to provide comprehensive, easily understandable reports. It is very much like a “box of lego”.
Additionally, the cloud version only provides CI/CD integration with GitHub projects. The review concluded that OWASP Threat Dragon is a good tool to use but has some limitations.
|
2. Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool
The Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool is an excellent fit for organizations invested in the Microsoft environment, offering a smooth learning curve.
| Cost | Free to use, with no hidden costs, providing great value for Microsoft-centric teams. |
| Usability | User-friendly interface with ample guidance documentation, but does have a Microsoft-focused design language. |
| Versatility and Methodologies | Good for adopting Microsoft’s security practices, especially when paired with Azure. |
| Integration | Highly integrated with Microsoft’s suite of products but limited content for other technology stacks. |
| Scalability | Capable of handling large projects within its ecosystem. |
| Support and Community Engagement: | Strong support network through Microsoft’s channels. |
| Pros | Step-by-step tutorials and extensive help resources: Automatic threat generation based on diagrams. |
| Cons | Less beneficial for non-Microsoft environments; May not support all modern threat modeling methodologies. This results in a content gap. |
| Website & GitHub | More details are available at Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool, and templates can be found on GitHub. |
| Reviews | Gained 4.5 rating at Pluralsight based on 27 ratings.
The review highlights the tool’s ability to generate simple and easy-to-understand reports. The author also notes that the tool is designed for non-security experts and provides clear guidance on creating and analyzing threat models.
Additionally, the review mentions that the tool is updated frequently, making it easier to maintain and use. Overall, the review concludes that the Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool is a helpful tool for identifying and mitigating potential security issues early in the development process.
|
3. PyTM
PyTM is the go-to threat modeling tool for developer-driven security in Python-centric organizations.
| Cost | Free and open-source, aligning well with the budgets of startups and agile development teams. |
| Usability | Tailored for Python developers, it has a learning curve for those unfamiliar with Python. |
| Versatility and Methodologies | Offers flexibility within code-based threat modeling but might require customization to fit non-standard methodologies. |
| Integration | Excels in integration with Python-heavy workflows and CI/CD pipelines. |
| Scalability | As a code-based tool, it scales naturally with the development cycle and team growth. |
| Support and Community Engagement: | Supported by Python and security communities, which increases developer engagement with the tool. |
| Pros | Can be easily automated within existing coding practices; Encourages continuous security consideration. |
| Cons | Potentially steep learning curve for non-developers; Less visual and interactive compared to GUI-based tools. |
| GitHub Presence: | Developers can contribute or use PyTM via the GitHub repository. |
| Reviews | Received 813 stars on Github.
The review provides an overview of the tool’s requirements, usage, and available elements, and it also includes an example of using PyTM to describe a simple application.
The review emphasizes the tool’s capability to generate diagrams and threats from the system definition, making it a valuable resource for threat modeling in Python-centric organizations.
|
4. SeaSponge
SeaSponge stands out for its simplicity and ease of use, making it ideal for quick, agile threat assessments.
| Cost | Free, with no need for installation or specialized hardware. |
| Usability | Exceptionally user-friendly for rapid modeling but may lack advanced features for deeper analyses. |
| Versatility and Methodologies | Best for basic threat modeling requirements, not suitable for complex methodologies. |
| Integration | Limited integration capabilities; best used as a standalone tool. |
| Scalability | Appropriate for small projects or educational purposes, not ideal for large-scale enterprise use. |
| Support and Community Engagement: | Developed by Mozilla, but the level of ongoing support and updates might be less than other tools. |
| Pros | Immediate access and ease of sharing models; No learning curve, allowing teams to model threats quickly. |
| Cons | Basic functionality can be too limited for some and less suited for detailed or custom methodology implementations. |
| Github Presence | Available on the SeaSponge GitHub repository. |
| Reviews | Earned 274 stars on Github.
The review describes SeaSponge as an accessible web-based threat modeling tool developed for Mozilla Winter of Security 2014. The tool is designed to be easy to use and provides a simple interface for creating threat models.
The review also mentions that SeaSponge is an OWASP Incubator project. However, the review provides no further details on the tool’s features or capabilities. |
5. IriusRisk Community Edition
The IriusRisk Community Edition strikes a robust balance between the complexities of enterprise threat modeling tools and the affordability of open-source platforms.
| Cost | Free version offers a powerful set of features without the typical expense of enterprise-grade tools. |
| Usability | Familiar interface for users experienced with draw.io, though there might be a learning curve for new users. |
| Versatility and Methodologies | Flexible enough to accommodate various threat modeling frameworks and methodologies. |
| Integration | Capable integrations, particularly with import/export features, but may not cover all third-party systems. |
| Scalability | Offers a starting point for scalability but may require stepping up to a full enterprise version for very large organizations. |
| Support and Community Engagement: | Active community support is augmented by IriusRisk’s commitment to its product line. |
| Pros | Combines ease of diagramming with security modeling; Ability to import/export data extends collaboration possibilities. |
| Cons | Some advanced features reserved for the paid version; Community edition’s feature set may not suffice for enterprise environments. |
| Website & GitHub | More information and access are provided on the IriusRisk website, with contributions and updates visible on GitHub. |
| Reviews | Achieved a 4.5-star rating on G2 Crowd.
The review highlights IriusRisk as an effective tool for automated threat modeling and enhancing DevSecOps with a “Shift Left” approach. It underscores its ability to integrate development and security.
The free Community Edition is noted for offering small teams a taste of its commercial capabilities, including auto-generated threat models from diagrams.
|
6. Threat Composer
Threat Composer is a simple threat modeling tool designed to help identify security issues and develop strategies to address them efficiently. It supports a non-linear threat modeling process, encouraging iterative design and development.
| Cost | It is a free and open-source tool developed by AWS Labs. |
| Usability | Users can benefit from a non-linear threat modeling process that encourages iterative design and development. |
| Versatility and Methodologies | The tool features an insights dashboard for improvement areas, structured threat statements following specific grammar, and capabilities to document system details, architecture, and data flows. |
| Integration | The tool’s design and deployment instructions suggest a few key points that could facilitate integration into broader security and development workflows |
| Scalability | Designed for a flexible and iterative approach, this tool facilitates identifying and mitigating security issues, allowing for adaptation as the modeled system changes. |
| Support and Community Engagement: | Threat Composer has active support and community engagement on GitHub, allowing users to report bugs, request features, and give feedback. |
| Pros | Enhances threat modeling efficiency through its support for iterative processes and strong GitHub community engagement for continuous improvement. |
| Cons | This may include a steep learning curve, customization limitations without technical expertise, and complex integration with existing security systems. |
| GitHub | More details are available at Threat Composer |
| Reviews | Received 342 stars on Github Users of Threat Composer commend its efficiency in threat modeling, particularly valuing its insights dashboard, structured threat statements, and comprehensive capture of system data. It facilitates an iterative, non-linear modeling approach that boosts collaboration and enhances threat identification quality.
|
By examining the pros and cons of these free threat modeling tools alongside the factors to consider when choosing a tool, organizations can match their unique needs to the strengths of each platform. From open-source accessibility to integration with existing workflows, the right tool exists to master the ongoing battle against cyber threats while aligning with your team’s expertise and resources.
Overview of Enterprise Threat Modeling Tools
Enterprise threat modeling tools are feature-rich solutions designed to meet the complex demands of large-scale security environments, offering scalability, integration, and advanced analytical capabilities. Large organizations often grapple with intricate security challenges that require a robust and sophisticated set of features from their threat modeling tools.
Enterprise threat modeling tools are equipped to handle the scalability necessary for large projects and the integrations demanded by complex IT ecosystems. These tools often come with enhanced support and onboarding resources, and they cater to a variety of compliance needs and advanced reporting criteria.
As we dive into the world of enterprise threat modeling tools, we’ll look at some of the leading solutions that are helping organizations streamline their security processes, comply with global regulations, and create a proactive culture of security by design.
1. SD Elements
SD Elements by Security Compass enables enterprises to operationalize proactive security and compliance best practices in a scalable and integrated manner, enhancing their application security posture.
Enterprise threat modeling is a critical aspect of cyber security, particularly for large organizations facing complex and constantly evolving threats. A tool like SD Elements brings a comprehensive and tailored approach to threat modeling that aligns with the intricate requirements of enterprise IT environments. It provides automation, deep integration capabilities, and a scalable framework that supports a security-by-design philosophy.
| Description and Key Features | SD Elements, a security by design platform, translates complex security guidelines into actionable countermeasures, simplifying the threat modeling process.
With SD Elements, security is no longer an afterthought, by increasing security throughout the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Its key features include:
|
| Cost and Value | SD Elements provides a cost-effective solution for threat modeling, delivering a strong return on investment by reducing the risks and costs associated with security breaches and non-compliance.
Pricing for SD Elements is based on the scale and specific needs of the enterprise, offering a value-focused solution. Organizations benefit from:
|
| Pros | SD Elements stands out for its focus on developers and smooth integration with policies, considering the ease of adaptation.
|
| Cons |
|
| Integrations and Scalability: | SD Elements is designed to integrate with a variety of DevSecOps tools, offering scalability that matches the growth of enterprise security needs.
SD Elements is built to accommodate the expanding scope of enterprise projects, integrating with DevSecOps tools to provide a cohesive and scalable threat modeling environment.
SD Elements integrates with Issue Trackers, SAST, DAST, SCA, and other security tools. |
| Website | Discover SD Elements and Security Compass. Learn more about how SD Elements can transform your enterprise cyber security efforts by visiting Security Compass’ SD Elements page. |
| Reviews | Rated 4.8 on Google.
Recognized for revolutionizing security integration into the software development lifecycle, SD Elements garners positive reviews from industry professionals and clients alike.
Clients appreciate SD Elements for its ability to translate security policies into developer tasks, automation of threat modeling, and streamlining of compliance. These capabilities are instrumental in building secure applications efficiently and are highly valued in the security community.
For detailed reviews and client testimonials, refer to the Security Compass website. |
2. ThreatModeler
ThreatModeler offers an automated, scalable solution that empowers enterprises to create and manage comprehensive threat models easily.
| Description and Key Features | ThreatModeler is an automated threat modeling solution that enables organizations to identify, predict, and define threats across different stages of application development. |
| Cost and Value | The licensing cost varies based on the size and needs of the organization; however, it’s a significant investment with a high ROI due to its comprehensive features, such as the ability to automate the threat modeling process, saving time and resources. |
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Integrations and Scalability: | Well-equipped to integrate with various enterprise systems, providing scalability for growing organizations and making it a robust long-term investment. |
| Website | For more details on how ThreatModeler can serve your enterprise’s needs, visit ThreatModeler. |
| Reviews | The review of ThreatModeler on PeerSpot describes the software as an efficient one-click threat modeling tool that automatically converts diagrams into threat models, identifies all threats based on the model, and updates the model based on new threats.
It emphasizes the tool’s suitability for organizations serious about threat modeling, positioning it as a top choice in the market. However, no specific user reviews are available on the platform yet. |
3. IriusRisk
IriusRisk provides a comprehensive platform for threat modeling with a strong focus on automation, collaboration, and integration within the secure development lifecycle.
| Description and Key Features | IriusRisk allows for interactive threat modeling with real-time updates and a rules engine to automate the security design process. |
| Cost and Value | Offers tiered pricing to accommodate different enterprise sizes, focusing on value through reducing the likelihood of costly breaches and streamlining compliance activities. |
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Integrations and Scalability | Strong integration capabilities with major DevOps and issue-tracking tools enable it to fit into most enterprise environments effectively. |
| Website | Explore the features and plans of IriusRisk at IriusRisk. |
| Reviews | Achieved a rating of 4.6 stars on Gartner Peer Insights.
The IriusRisk website highlights the tool’s capability to automate the experience for teams already using diagramming or cloud orchestration tools, and its focus on empowering non-security professionals to effectively analyze and mitigate threats across their broader architecture or software supply chain.
Additionally, G2 features details, pricing, and features of IriusRisk, emphasizing its power to ensure security is woven into the design phase and followed up into production, operating as a central orchestration point for security
|
4. securiCAD by foreseeti
SecuriCAD by Foreseeti pioneers cybersecurity threat modeling with a simulation-driven approach, offering proactive insights and defense strategies.
| Description and Key Features | securiCAD by foreseeti uses advanced modeling and simulations to provide a proactive analysis of cyber threats, vulnerabilities, and potential attack paths. |
| Cost and Value | Pricing models are tailored for the enterprise segment, providing value through advanced predictive capabilities that enable security teams to prioritize and address critical attack vectors preemptively. |
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Integrations and Scalability | Designed to scale with large enterprises and complex systems, integrating with a range of security tools and data inputs. |
| Website | Gain insight into securiCAD’s simulation-driven modeling at foreseeti. |
| Reviews | The review presents SecuriCAD as a user-friendly threat modeling tool offering attack simulations, complemented by online learning for its free Community edition and additional support for its Enterprise edition.
It details a pricing model dependent on edition, model size, and simulation count, noting the Enterprise edition is tailored for moderately complex architectures.
|
5. Arxan Threat Analytics
Arxan Threat Analytics provides real-time threat defense insights, making it a formidable asset for enterprises prioritizing mobile and application security.
| Description and Key Features | Integrates with Arxan Application Protection to offer comprehensive analytics on the security posture of protected applications, highlighting active threats and potential vulnerabilities. |
| Cost and Value | The pricing is based on the level of protection and analytics required, delivering value by offering deep insights into application security and threat patterns, which can preempt costly breaches. |
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Integrations and Scalability | Built to work with existing mobile and IoT security frameworks and scales with the application infrastructure of an enterprise. |
| Website | Discover the full capabilities of Arxan Threat Analytics at Arxan Technologies. |
| Reviews | Arxan Threat Analytics, praised by The Silicon Review, excels in application protection by securing over 1 billion app instances with advanced techniques like code hardening and encryption.
Distinguished for its comprehensive security approach beyond perimeter defenses, Arxan emerges as a crucial ally for businesses in safeguarding applications against cyber threats.
|
6. Axure RP
Axure RP, while traditionally a UX/UI prototyping tool, can serve as a sophisticated platform for the visualization segment of threat modeling.
| Description and Key Features | Axure RP allows designers to create rich interactive prototypes of applications, which threat modeling teams can use to visualize data flows and potential attack vectors during the early stages of design. |
| Cost and Value | Axure comes with a subscription model, and while not a traditional threat modeling tool, it delivers value by helping organizations ideate, understand, and communicate complex system architectures. |
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Integrations and Scalability | Highly versatile in prototyping complex and large-scale systems, providing a solid visualization foundation for subsequent threat analysis. |
| Website | Explore prototyping for threat modeling with Axure RP at Axure. |
| Reviews | Rated 4.0 stars on Gartner Peer Insights.
According to reviews on TrustRadius, Axure RP is commonly used for various purposes in the software development industry. It is primarily utilized by UX designers to plan, prototype, and hand off projects to developers without code.
The tool is reviewed as being known for creating robust, hi-fi interactive UX/UI prototypes, and it is used for concepting and prototyping new products and features, as well as enhancing current ones.
|
Each of these enterprise tools offers a unique set of capabilities to streamline threat modeling for large organizations.
By evaluating these tools against specific requirements such as compliance, automation, and team collaboration, enterprises can choose a threat modeling platform that not only supports their current needs but also scales with their future growth.
These platforms can become integral to an organization’s cybersecurity defense, empowering them to stay ahead of emerging threats and maintain robust security practices.
Adding these tools to the list of paid enterprise threat modeling solutions provides a broader perspective on the options available to large organizations. It’s crucial to assess each tool not only on its threat modeling capabilities but also on how it fits into the overall security ecosystem of the enterprise.
Using these tools effectively can enhance a company’s ability to understand, communicate, and mitigate potential threats to its digital products.
Selecting the Optimal Threat Modeling Tool: Tailoring to Your Needs
Selecting the best threat modeling tool requires carefully analyzing your organizational needs, security goals, and the specific features that will empower your team to build resilient systems.
To make the right choice, match the tool’s capabilities with your project size, complexity, and industry-specific requirements. Consider the following questions to guide your decision:
- Does the tool align with your existing development and security workflows?
- Does it offer the necessary scalability as your organization grows?
- Can it integrate with other systems and tools you currently use?
- How does it contribute to regulatory compliance and meeting industry standards?
- What is the learning curve, and does the tool provider offer adequate support?
You can identify which solution will serve you best by answering these questions and revisiting the details provided for each tool in this post. Remember, the most expensive or sophisticated tool is not always the right one; it’s about finding the fit that complements your team’s expertise and enhances your security posture without unnecessary complexity.
Conclusion: Securing Your Software Development Lifecycle
Effective threat modeling is essential for securing your software development lifecycle, reducing risks, and ensuring that security is a priority from the onset.
As cyber threats continue to evolve, the need for robust threat modeling becomes even more critical. With the right tool in hand, your team can anticipate and mitigate potential threats, contributing to a more secure application.
The tools discussed in this guide range from free, open-source solutions ideal for small projects or budget-conscious teams, to comprehensive enterprise-grade platforms designed for large organizations facing complex security challenges.
Embrace the tool that best aligns with your needs and make threat modeling an integral part of your security strategy. The investment in time and resources will pay dividends in your software’s resilience and data protection.
Additional Resources
For those eager to expand their knowledge and dive deeper into threat modeling and cybersecurity, here are additional resources that may be useful:
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) – Threat Modeling Tools
-
What is threat modeling in cybersecurity?
Threat modeling is proactively identifying, understanding, and managing cybersecurity threats. It involves analyzing the design of your systems to find potential security issues, and their respective mitigations.
-
How does threat modeling improve software security?
By incorporating threat modeling, teams can identify potential security flaws early in the development process, allowing for cost-effective and timely mitigations and reducing the likelihood of security incidents.
-
Can threat modeling be integrated into Agile and DevOps practices?
Yes, many modern threat modeling tools offer integrations with CI/CD pipelines and support Agile and DevOps workflows, enabling real-time threat assessments and continuous security.
-
Is there a one-size-fits-all threat modeling tool?
No, because every organization has different needs based on their size, industry, and specific security requirements. Selecting a tool that aligns with your team’s capabilities and project complexities is important.
-
What is the best threat modeling tool?
The “best” tool depends on factors like your team’s structure, development environment, and security requirements. Tools like OWASP Threat Dragon are excellent for those seeking a free, open-source solution, whereas enterprise tools like SD Elements or ThreatModeler provide more advanced features suitable for large organizations.
-
Are there any free threat modeling tools available?
Yes, several free tools like OWASP Threat Dragon, Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool, and PyTM offer robust threat modeling capabilities.
-
What factors should I consider when choosing a threat modeling tool?
Key considerations include the cost, ease of use, supported methodologies, integration with your current toolchain, scalability to handle project growth, and the type of support provided by the community or vendor.
-
Can non-security experts use threat modeling tools effectively?
Many tools are designed to be user-friendly and come with educational resources, making them accessible to non-experts. However, having a team member with security knowledge can enhance the process.